Forums SouLink.co: La foire aux idées, suggestions

	16/09/2022 13:26:12 0 vaccination in the presentation sheet!! Good day 1) I am surprised to see the "vaccination" section between that of "sexual orientation" and that of "parenthood", before the question of "tobacco"... On this page put some broad lines on who we are, it’s OK. But seeing that vaccination comes so early in the list of questions surprises me. - Why this question at this stage of the presentation rather than in the “intimate” section? 2) What surprises me at least as much is that the question is suggestive and not frank. You can be vaccinated against tetanus or malaria and not seasonal flu or COVID. or the opposite!!! - Why isn’t the question more explicit? 3) What shocks me is that when you don’t answer yes or no... it automatically appears "no". While for other questions it remains empty. - Why this fallacious interpretation of silence? I hope that, at least in my form, the answer remains blank. I feel free to discuss this subject in private regardless of my position and that of my interlocutor. I refuse arbitrary labeling, whether or not it corresponds to my reality. Counting on your understanding, With cordiality


	17/09/2022 01:27:19 I find it normal to know if the person is vaccinated quickly because a vaccinated, unvaccinated relationship is not desirable.

	17/09/2022 11:52:02 Hello and thank you We wondered for a long time whether we would add this option and after questioning our members at the time, the majority said yes. But in fact if the option does not wish to respond is visible I will report it to the technician.

	17/09/2022 15:12:24 Thanks for the technical aspect. Although it seems to me that vaccination against seasonal flu is an important subject, as well as for the 11 vaccines that have become compulsory for children, I assume that we are talking here about the vaccine against COVID 19. I am stunned to read that a vaccinated/unvaccinated relationship is not desirable!!! I have difficulty understanding the meaning of this remark which I feel is a rather arbitrary judgment (whatever my position on vaccination). There are many people in my close and less close circle who have been vaccinated (with all the doses or only one) and unvaccinated people and individuals whose vaccination status I do not know. I have a hard time imagining leaving my relationships with those whose situation is different from mine!!!! I find this as discriminating as basing my relationships on sexual, political, religious, ecological orientation, etc. of my interlocutors. What a void that would create around me! If we are talking about a couple or sentimental relationship, there again, open-mindedness has its place. And I can’t see myself refusing to interact with someone to whom I feel attracted on various points just because this person may or may not be vaccinated, regardless of the reason why they find themselves in this situation. Some people are vaccinated out of conviction, others out of necessity, others against their expressed wishes. And among the unvaccinated, the reasons for refusal are varied, and the reasons for not vaccinating too. I know people who were unable to be vaccinated even though they wanted to. If I do not wish to state my situation in a presentation sheet even though I am completely comfortable talking about it in private, it is because I refuse an arbitrary division without the possibility of dialogue. I have seen so many individuals change their minds in one direction or the other on this subject, so many families torn apart, so many friendships blurred that I find this question very divisive, in a general presentation if, as said above, it is not possible not to answer! If the incompatibility lies more in the sharing of cellular information which is transmitted during sexual intercourse... that’s something else. And here again, discussion is possible as are the alternatives. For your information, I know couples where one member has been HIV positive for years without harming the couple. In sexual relations many codes are transmitted, which “we” would do well without (Herpes, papillomavirus, etc.) Anyway, I hope that the technician will be able to neutralize the non-answer to this question as well as to the others. Thank you for taking my comment into consideration. Heartfelt feelings

	18/09/2022 17:17:18 I was talking about an intimate relationship given the responses received from people like Professor Montagné

	18/09/2022 21:48:11 Are you talking about the fact that during sexual intercourse there is a transmission of cells? and therefore an unvaccinated person could receive codes written in the cells of a vaccinated person? I fully understand this risk and take it very seriously. However, many couples are forced to exercise great vigilance in their relationships due to the risk of various transmissions. Furthermore, any exchange on this site does not necessarily lead to a meeting, and even less to an intimate relationship. I would find it distressing to deprive myself of enriching exchanges just because of a difference in vaccination status. And if by chance, I established a connection here leading to a sentimental relationship inducing intimate relationships, well before getting there the subject would have been broached. And if by misadventure, this partner was in a different vaccination status from mine and the bond between us goes beyond this consideration, we would take the usual precautions that I also take for other reasons. I think, in all sincerity, that by setting a lot of selective criteria or prerequisites for an encounter, we deprive ourselves of the magic (the soul that acts) of the surprises of life, those that elevate us in the adversity and joy combined. With all my heart

	23/09/2022 05:00:07 The soul chose who acted